PAN India Submitted Memorandum to the Standing Committee on Agriculture, Demands Critical Amendments to the Pesticide Management Bill 2020
6th August 2021

In a memorandum submitted to the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Agriculture, PAN India demands critical amendments to the Pesticide Management Bill 2020. The proposed act should have addressed issues ensuring sustainable agriculture production without harming the environment, ensuring farmer and worker safety as well as safe food production, and gradually eliminating use of toxic pesticides by laying down a path towards wider adoption of non chemical pest management based on agroecology principles in realization of the precautionary principle and assuring the rights guaranteed by the Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
The Pesticide Management Bill 2020 (PMB2020) was introduced in the Rajya Sabha in March 2020 after the Union Cabinet approved it in February 2020. The Bill, as proposed, would replace the existing Insecticides Act 1968, and two draft bills proposed earlier in 2008 and 2017. The Bill has been referred to the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Agriculture on 3rd June 2021. The committee had sought comments and suggestions from stakeholder for the purpose of wider consultation.
As the new legislation intends to regulate the pesticide sector in India, by replacing the 50-year-old Insecticides Act 1968, it needs to be comprehensive enough to address the ground reality of pesticide use and related complexities in the country among other aspects. A comprehensive review conducted by PAN India team shows critical lacunae in the current Bill. Based on the findings PAN India submitted memorandum to the Standing committee on Agriculture.
The following problems are noted in the current Bill:
-
Though the bill has some welcoming, remarkable provisions such as those for monitoring of pesticide poisoning and compensating legal hairs of victims, it does not address many critical issues of technical aspects.
-
The bill failed to address the actual pesticide use scenario and comprehensive registration process in view of pesticide risk reduction.
-
The bill never addressed protection of pesticide users – farmers and farm workers.
-
Some of the clauses in the bill are actually meant to provide insulation to authority and pesticide business without inclusion of balancing accountability and transparency clauses.
-
The national pesticide regulation should have been complied with internationally accepted criteria, standards and guidelines on pesticide registration, protection of users and community as well as environment.
Find below the submission from PAN India.
Covering letter
Critical Lacunae in the Bill
Clause wise problems
Recent Posts
- PAN India applauds the EU’s ban on 6 hazardous pesticides as a timely move
- ചേർപ്പ് പഞ്ചായത്തിൽ അഗ്രോ – ഇക്കോളജി പ്രൊജക്റ്റ് ഉദ്ഘാടനം ചെയ്തു
- India Bans Four Highly Hazardous Pesticides: PAN India welcomes this step
- Phase-out Pesticides: Target set by 2035
- ഏലം അഗ്രോ-ഇക്കോളജി പ്രൊജക്റ്റ് ഉദ്ഘാടനം ചെയ്തു
Tags
Adverse Effects of Herbicides
Agroecology
AnupamVarma Commitee Report
Banned Pesticides
BAN Pesticides
BRS COPs 2017
Corporate Accountability
Draft Banning of Insecticides Order 2020
Draft Banning of Pesticides Order 2016
Drone Spraying
Fact Finding Mission
Glufosinate
Glyphosate
Herbicides
HHP
HHPs
Highly Hazardous Pesticides
India
India Pesticide Ban
India Pesticide Risk
MAPPP
Occupational Poisoning
Paraquat
Paraquat Retailing India
Paraquat Use is India
Pesticide Legislation-India
Pesticide Management Bill 2020
Pesticide Poisoning in Yavatmal
Pesticide Poisonong
Pesticide Posioning
Pesticide Regulation
Pesticide Regulation India
Pesticides
Phasing out HHPs
PMB2020
Regulation
Restriction On use of Glyphosate order 2020
Roundup
Safe Farming
Safe Food
Syngenta
UN HRC Special Rapporteur on the right to food
Victims of Pesticide Poisoning
Webinar
Yavatmal poisoning